Monday, September 24, 2012

Sem 1: 2012/13, DrZin's Workbase Output & Student's Works

PROJECT 1:
Project 1 Submission : Background Study & Seminar Presentation.
24th Sept. 2012.

1. Group 1:  Climate & Architecture in Gaza.
2. Group 2: Case Study of Primary & Secondary Education in Palestin (Gaza).

PROJECT 2:
SITE ANALYSIS PROCESS





































Monday, September 3, 2012

Sem 1: 2012/2013 : DrZin's Workbase Program

SCHOOL Behind the Wall







Palestine was invaded by British several years before it was occupied by zionist Israeli regime started in 1948. Palestinian people who lived freely in peace in their own land were threatened, chased out or killed by the regime to allow them to achieve their goal. Today, most of the Palestinian land were occupied and used by Israeli public, private and individuals who are alien to Palestinian land before. Palestinian people were forced to live in a difficult situation and conditions in the occupied land of West Bank and Gaza Strip. Surrounded by walls and denied basic facilities.

The adult were denied of jobs and their properties often confiscated and destroyed. Up to 11,000 of the Palestinian adult and young were imprisoned due to some simple act of resistance to Israeli oppression.  The Palestinian families are always in danger and difficult situation and the future of Palestinian people is very uncertain.

For more then 60 years, people of Palestine are suffering and the right to education among school children are also denied. They only have hope.The concrete walls built by Israeli zionist regime surrounding their homes and villages are another type of oppression imposed by israeli.

The blockade on Gaza strip was imposed by Israeli and it's allies since 2006. Almost all types of goods from necessity to general uses were not allowed to enter Gaza strip of Palestine. The situation  worsened when Israeli attacked Gaza strip using all kinds of weapons in 2008 and early 2009. There are 1500 killed and more then 4500 were injured, among them were schoolchildren.

The attack on Gaza not only destroyed many infrastructures but also school buildings and facilities. Children of Palestine are denied for basic and proper education. 


More then 60% of the population in Gaza are children (around 1 mil out of 1.7mil population), and children are particularly vulnerable in situations of armed conflict. The UN Office of the Humanitarian Coordinator (OCHA) indicates that children are among victims killed and injured as a result of the recent air strikes. It is critical that humanitarian assistance, including food, medical supplies, educational items, equipment and other types of goods be allowed into Gaza to address the urgent needs of children and women.







Design a school complex in Gaza

My workbase for this semester will be focusing on the design of primary or secondary school in Palestine, particularly in Gaza. Students in my workbase will require to make a reading related to topics on several issues related to Palestine issues, education issues and challenges to provide decent education facilities to the young community in Palestine which is currently under Israeli occupation and oppressions.

Since the design theme for this semester will focus on educational institutions, the course provides exercises in designing a complex of buildings with a  medium/long span structure and with a complexity involving the site planning of several medium scale public access structures that has a building height of four to eight stories (Low-rise) involving the occupancy of not more than 250 persons within an area of 3 acres. Students are required to integrate some knowledge of architectural theory/approach/investigation in designing the buildings with awareness of the services, structural systems, the required construction materials and components and address the related building by-laws. 







Site for the school
The site for the proposed school is on a piece of land in the Gaza strip. 





Some important activities for DrZin's WB
Apart from all standard activities and responsibilities stated by the year coordinator of the studio, this workbase have planned several activities aimed to achieve the objectives of this workbase such as:-

1. Getting involved in the search for Palestinian info through research and data gathering. 
2. Organise awareness campaign and fund raising for the benefit of WB groups and Palestinian people.
3. Traveling within and outside the country to achieve the best of WB objective.

To achieve that, this workbase members must have some important criterias:-
1. Have sense of humanity and care to the people who are being oppressed.
2. Ready to learn and feel the difficulties faced by the palestinians.
3. Ready to organise and actively involved in the activities to help them.
4. Willing to scarifice in terms of time, comfort and energy.
5. Ready to be with the WB activities towards achieving WB goal.


No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11


# To know more about our team: Please click on the names above (link to FB).

************@@@@@**************
References for Background & Site Context;


References for Climatic Knowledge;

References for Site Analysis Process;

Design Ideas


Student's Works : Developments & Final Design Ideas












Sem 1: 2012/2013 : General Course Outline


Course Code: SBA 2126






Semester: 1
Academic Session:   2012/2013

Total Contact Hours: 130

DESIGN 4

Lecturer
:
Dr Alice Sabrina Ismail (Coordinator)
Dr Khairul Anuar Mohd Khaidzir
AP Dr Zin Kandar
Ar Hong Lim Foo
Dr Dilshan Remaz


Synopsis







The course provides exercises in designing a complex of buildings with a  medium/long span structure and with a complexity involving the site planning of several medium scale public access structures such as commercial buildings, educational institutions, housing, government buildings, health institutions, transportation and telecommunication hubs, as well as religious institution that has a building height of four to eight stories (Low-rise) involving the occupancy of not more than 250 persons within an area of 3 acres. Students are required to integrate some knowledge of architectural theory/approach/investigation in designing the buildings with awareness of the services, structural systems, the required construction materials and components and address the related building by-laws. However, design theme for this semester will focus on educational institutions and building typologies that can be address by each studio master should relate to this theme. Building typologies under the educational institutions theme may involve built form like child development centres including preschool and day-care, elementary and secondary schools, university, including college and post-graduate education, training facilities, academies and research centres. The choosing and location of the site depends on the social cultural issues addressed by studio masters.
·       Studio masters need to follow the format for preparing each handout for the given projects – 1,2,3,4 (do refer to attachments)
·       Studio masters need to follow the designated given mark during assessment for all given projects – 1,2,3,4 according to the CO and PO’s (do refer to attachments)- This is important to ensure inconsistency of marking between all 3rd yr studios.
·       Every studio masters must involve in giving lecture inputs to all 3rd year students (venue , date and time TBC)



LEARNING OUTCOMES

By the end of the course, students should be able to:

Course Learning Outcome
Programme
Outcome
Taxonomies
(C, P, A)
And Generic Skills
Assessment Methods
CLO1 To demonstrate the ability to produce the building brief related to a particular architectural issue.



CLO2 To solve design issues related to the site planning of several buildings with  the appropriate layout of architectural spaces, image and forms to cater to the needs of a medium rise and medium/long span building.

CLO3 To integrate the necessary technical support aspects such as building services, structures, examples of a significant construction detail whilst illustrating complete compliance to building by-laws on siting and fire safety.


CLO4 To communicate and justify  graphically and orally  the design in a clear and concise manner

CLO5 To integrate ethics , lifelong learning in studio program (address only)
PO1




PO2



PO3



PO4
C1-5




P1-4



P1-4



CS1-4
Project 1,
Project 3



Project 2
 Project 3


Project 4



Project1, 2,3,4







STUDENT LEARNING TIME (SLT)

Teaching and Learning Activities
Student Learning Time (hours)
1.     Face-to-Face Learning
a.     Lecturer-Centered Learning
                                      i.     Lecture
10

b.     Student-Centered Learning (SCL)
                                      i.     Laboratory/Tutorial

120
2.     Self-Directed Learning
a.     Non-face-to-face learning or student-centered learning (SCL) such as manual, assignment, module, e-Learning, etc.
60
b.     Revision
0
c.      Assessment Preparations
40
3.     Formal Assessment
a.     Continuous Assessment
0
b.     Final Exam
0
Total (SLT)
230

TEACHING METHODOLOGY

1.     Lectures
2.     Trips









GENERAL WEEKLY SCHEDULE

Week 1
10 Sept 2012
:
Monday - Intro to the course and activities.
Grouping of students for seminar. Briefing of all projects and discussion
1st project  given
Friday – Design Forum 1(theoretical background, developing case studies and issues)(Dr Khairul) Date TBC
Week 2
17 Sept
# 21 September 2012
:
Monday - Studio Discussion of seminar & Open lecture on details and construction (AP Dr Mahmud & Ar Ramli)
Wednesday – Open lecture on technical (fire fighting) Ar Marzuki
Friday –Presentation (1st project submission)
Weekend Trip and Site Visit
Week 3
:
Monday – 2nd project given & Open lecture on energy efficiency (AP Dr Amin)
Friday –Design Forum 2(site planning issues and case study)(Dr Alice) Date TBC
Week 4
:
Monday – Class Exercise or Site Studies (link with industry – Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia- vision of Malaysian education; teachers (national, architect, international), NGO, UNRWA, architect who design schools, one thesis student who design school)
Friday - Class Exercise or Site Studies(link with industry – Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia- vision of Malaysian education; teachers (national, architect, international), NGO, UNRWA, architect who design schools, one thesis student who design school)
Week 5
:
Monday – Class Exercise or Site Studies
Friday -  Design Forum 3(sustainable design approach and case study)(Dr Remas) Date TBC
Week 6
# 15 October 2012
:
Monday – 2nd project  submission
Friday -  3rd and 4th project  given
Week 7
:
Monday – Class Exercise or Site Studies
Friday – Class Exercise or Site Studies
Week 8
:
Mid Semester
Week 9
:
Monday- Design Forum 4 (structure and construction and case study) Ar Hong Date TBC
Friday -Studio Crit on Design Development
Week 10
:
Monday- Studio Crit on Design Development
Friday- Preparation of Technical Drawings and Report
Week 11
:
Monday – Studio Crit on Design Development
Friday - Design Forum 5 (services issues and case study) AP Dr Zin Date TBC
Week 12
# 30 November 2012
:
Monday- Studio Technical  presentation
Friday- Preparation of Technical Drawings and Report
Week 13
:
Monday – Studio Crit on Design Development
Friday- Preparation of Technical Drawings and Report
Week 14
# 14 December 2012
:
Monday- Preparation of Technical Drawings and Report
Friday- Final Technical Evaluation: Marks shall be given 20% by panel technical (AP Dr Amin, AP Dr Eka, Dr Khairul, Dr Remas) and 10% by studio masters
Week 15
# 19 December 2012
:
3rd project submission and final assessment (one whole day Wednesday) for all 3rd year
Week 16
:
Portfolio
Week 17
:
Portfolio





GRADING:



Project
Description
Marks %

Product

Marks

CLO1
CLO2
CLO3
CLO4
Portion
1
Brief Development
2 weeks
(group)
5



Explorative exposition of a case study  in a comprehensive way and design brief on given project
10


0






0







5
Illustrate  proper slide presentation  (2.5) and report with diagrams to explain the issues.(2.5)
10%
2
Design Brief and site analysis (group) & (individual)
3 weeks
0
6


Identification of issues [problem statement], interpretation  of design generators, design brief and Concept Formulation (individual)
20



10

Site Study, Data Collection & Site Analysis and Massing (group)




4
Writing Design Brief [Individual Report] (2)
Illustrate  proper presentation of the findings with sketches to explain the issues in boards (2)
20%
3
Main Building Project
6 weeks (individual)
10



Producing complete project by incorporating the schematic drawing derived from project  2
40



20


Illustrate  proper presentation of the findings with complete drawing schemes to explain the issues in boards




0







10
Portray good communication and verbal skills in terms of architectural language usage
45%
4
Technical Submission
3 weeks (individual)
0




30


0






20

Producing technical drawings relating to the project  as done in project 3




10
Illustrate  proper presentation of the report with sketches to explain the issues.
25%
Total
100


GENERAL REFERENCES :

Design Theory

  American Planning Association (2006) Planning and Urban Design Standards, Hoboken NJ: Willey
  Moughtin, Cliff (1999) Urban Design, Methods and techniques, London: Routledge
  Macdonnald, Angus (2001)
Structure and Architecture, Burlington MA: Elsevier
  Ford, Edward (2003)
The Details of Modern Architecture, Cambridge MA: MIT Press
  Cotts, David & Kathy O Ropper & Richard P Payant (2010) Facility management Handbook, New York: Amacom

Architectural Theory
Walters, David & Linda Brown (2004)
Design First: Design Based Planning for Communities, London: Architectural Press
  Heat, Kingston (2009)
Vernacular Architecture and Regional Design : Cultural Process and Environmental Response, London: Architectural Press
  Katz, Peter (1994) The New Urbanism, Toward an Architecture of Community, New York: McGraw Hill Professional
  Walters, David (2007)  Designing Communities: Charrette, masterplans, and Form-Based Codes, New York: Elsevier/ Architectural Press
  Zyscovich, Bernard & Douglas R Porter (2008) Getting Real about Urbanism: Contextual Design for Cities, Washington DC: Urban Land Institute
  Jerke, Dennis & Douglas R Porter & Terry J Lascar (2008), Urban Design and the Bottom Line, Optimizing the Return on Perception, Washington DC: Urban Land Institute

Building by Law
Anthony ,Speaight (2009) Architect's Legal Handbook: The Law for Architects, Edition9, Elsevier Science
Laws of Malaysia, Uniform Buildings By Law, MDC Publisher


Places of visit  (3rd year)-  Kuala Lumpur (general trip) for all studio 2 days trip (all 3rd year)

i)               National and International school and adult learning school
ii)              PAM centre Kuala Lumpur
iii)            Lim Kok Wing University
iv)             Taylor’s University